We thought Don’t Tweet During Fire was unique. Unfortunately it isn’t…..
If you enjoyed this post you’ll certainly enjoy these other ‘Just For Fun’ posts!
To Tweet or Not To Tweet (During a Fire). That Is The Question?
Reply
Daily Archives: August 6, 2020
Home Equity Levels Improve Across Nation In Second Quarter Of 2020 Despite Coronavirus Pandemic
Equity-Rich Properties Continue to Outnumber Those Seriously Underwater by Four-to-One Margin; Portion of U.S. Homes Considered Equity-Rich Ticks Up to 27.5 Percent; Seriously Underwater Properties Down to 6 Percent
Irvine, CA – Aug. 6, 2020 (PRNewswire) ATTOM Data Solutions, curator of the nation’s premier property database and first property data provider of Data-as-a-Service (DaaS), today released its second-quarter 2020 U.S. Home Equity & Underwater Report, which shows that 15.2 million residential properties in the United States were considered equity-rich, meaning that the combined estimated amount of loans secured by those properties was 50 percent or less of their estimated market value.
The count of equity-rich properties in the second quarter of 2020 represented 27.5 percent, or about one in four, of the 55.2 million mortgaged homes in the United States. That was up from the 26.5 percent level in the first quarter of 2020, despite the spreading economic fallout from the worldwide Coronavirus pandemic.
The report also shows that just 3.4 million, or one in 16, mortgaged homes in the second quarter of 2020 were considered seriously underwater, with a combined estimated balance of loans secured by the property at least 25 percent more than the property’s estimated market value. That figure represented 6.2 percent of all U.S. properties with a mortgage, down from 6.6 percent in the prior quarter.
Among the 50 states, 49 showed an increase in the percentage of homes considered equity-rich while just three showed an increase in the percentage that were seriously underwater.
The second-quarter home equity picture reflects a housing market that put out strong, but mixed signals, amid a nationwide economic slowdown aimed at battling the spread of a pandemic that began surging across the country in February and March of this year. Unemployment spiked and sales slumped from April through June, but single-family home equity remained strong as most housing markets saw prices rise on properties that did sell.
“Homeowners saw their equity rise far and wide throughout the United States during the second quarter of this year in yet another sign of the housing market punching back against the Coronavirus pandemic. More property owners rose into equity-rich territory and escaped the seriously underwater lane, putting more money into the average household,” said Todd Teta, chief product officer with ATTOM Data Solutions. “The housing market still faces enormous challenges, given that unemployment remains historically high and the broader economy contracted severely in the second quarter. If that continues, owner equity will be seriously threatened. But for now, homeowners are enjoying the gains when it comes to what, for most, is their most significant asset.”
Midwest and South show biggest improvements in equity-rich share of homes and largest declines in underwater properties
Seven of the 10 states with the biggest gains in the share of equity-rich homes from the first quarter to the second quarter of 2020 were in the South and Midwest. They were led by Georgia, where the level of homes considered equity-rich rose from 17.5 percent in the first quarter of 2020 to 20 percent in the second quarter, Idaho (up from 33.6 percent to 35.4 percent), Mississippi (up from 19.3 percent to 21 percent), Indiana (up from 23.5 percent to 25.2 percent) and Nebraska (up from 18.2 percent to 19.9 percent).
States with decreases or the smallest gains from the first to the second quarter of 2020 included Hawaii (down from 39 percent to 38.6 percent), Delaware (stayed the same at 17.9 percent), New Jersey (stayed the same at 23.7 percent), Illinois (up from 15.2 percent to 15.6 percent) and North Dakota (up from 20.8 percent to 21.3 percent).
Nine of the 10 states with the biggest declines from the first to the second quarter of 2020 in the percentage of homes considered seriously underwater also were in the Midwest and South. They were led by West Virginia, (share of homes seriously underwater down from 15.7 percent to 13.8 percent), Mississippi (down from 16.9 percent to 15 percent), Georgia (down from 9.9 percent to 8.4 percent), South Dakota (down from 12.4 percent to 11.1 percent) and Alabama (down from 11.3 percent to 10.2 percent).
States where the percentage of seriously underwater homes rose or stayed the same in the second quarter of 2020 from the previous quarter included Hawaii (up from 2.7 percent to 2.8 percent), Indiana (up from 7.7 percent to 7.8 percent), Colorado (stayed at 2.8 percent), Oregon (stayed at 2.5 percent) and Delaware (stayed at 9.3 percent).
Northeast and West continue to have largest shares of equity-rich homes
Despite the improvement in the Midwest and South, the top 10 states with the highest share of equity-rich properties in the second quarter of 2020 were all in the Northeast and West regions, led by California (43 percent of homes were equity rich), Vermont (39.1 percent), Hawaii (38.6 percent), Washington (38.1 percent) and Idaho (35.4 percent),
States with the lowest percentage of equity-rich properties in the second quarter of 2020 were Louisiana (14 percent equity-rich), Oklahoma (15.6 percent), Illinois (15.6 percent), Arkansas (16.9 percent) and Alabama (17.6 percent). Those were the same states with five lowest levels in the first quarter of 2020.
Among 107 metropolitan statistical areas analyzed in the report with a population greater than 500,000, nine of the 10 with the highest shares of equity-rich properties in the second quarter of 2020 were in the West, led by San Jose, CA (64 percent equity-rich); San Francisco, CA (56.5 percent); Los Angeles, CA (47.9 percent); Santa Rosa, CA (45.3 percent) and Seattle, WA (40.9 percent). The leader in the Northeast region again was Boston, MA, (35.9 percent), while Dallas, TX, again led the South (38.3 percent) and Grand Rapids, MI, continued to top the Midwest (28.8 percent).
Metro areas with the lowest percentage of equity-rich properties in the second quarter of 2020 were again Baton Rouge, LA (10.7 percent equity-rich); Columbia, SC (14 percent); Little Rock, AR (14 percent); Dayton, OH (15 percent) and Tulsa, OK (15.2 percent).
Among the 107 metro areas, 100 (93.5 percent) showed an increase in levels of equity-rich properties from the first to the second quarter of 2020; just seven (6.5 percent) showed a decrease.
Top equity-rich counties concentrated in West and Northeast
Among 1,492 counties that had at least 2,500 properties with mortgages in the second quarter of 2020, 21 of the top 25 equity-rich locations were in the West or Northeast regions. The highest concentration was in California.
Counties with the highest share of equity-rich properties were San Mateo County (outside San Francisco), CA (71.1 percent equity-rich); San Francisco County, CA (68.3 percent); Santa Clara County (San Jose), CA (64.9 percent); Dukes County (Martha’s Vineyard), MA (58.9 percent) and Alameda County (outside San Francisco), CA (56.3 percent).
Counties with the smallest share were Wayne County, IN (outside Indianapolis) (5.8 percent); Vernon Parish, LA (6 percent); Hoke County, NC (outside Fayetteville) (6.5 percent); Beauregard Parish, LA (outside Lake Charles) (7.2 percent) and Hampton City-County, VA (outside Newport News) (7.4 percent).
At least half of all properties were equity-rich in 482 zip codes
Among 8,334 U.S. zip codes that had at least 2,000 properties with mortgages in the second quarter of 2020, there were 482 where at least half of all properties with a mortgage were equity rich.
Twenty-four of the top 25 were in California, mostly in the San Francisco Bay area. They were led by zip codes 94116 in San Francisco (80.7 percent equity-rich), 94122 in San Francisco (80.3 percent), 94112 in San Francisco (78.9 percent), 94306 in Palo Alto, CA (77.1 percent) and 94040 in Mountain View (76.9 percent). The same zip codes were in the top five in the first quarter of 2020.
Highest seriously underwater shares remain in the South and Midwest
The top 10 states with the highest shares of mortgages that were seriously underwater in the second quarter of 2020 were all in the South and Midwest regions, led by Louisiana (16.4 percent seriously underwater), Mississippi (15 percent), Iowa (13.9 percent), West Virginia (13.8 percent) and Arkansas (12.4 percent).
Among 107 metropolitan statistical areas analyzed in the report with a population greater than 500,000, those with the highest share of mortgages that were seriously underwater in the second quarter of 2020 were Youngstown, OH (15.7 percent); Baton Rouge, LA (15.5 percent); Syracuse, NY (14.1 percent); Scranton, PA (14 percent) and Toledo, OH (12.8 percent).
Among the 107 metro areas, 18 (16.8 percent) showed an increase in levels of underwater properties from the first to the second quarter of 2020; 89 (83.2 percent) showed a decrease.
At least 25 percent of all properties were seriously underwater in 130 zip codes
Among 8,334 U.S. zip codes that had at least 2,000 properties with mortgages in the second quarter of 2020, there were 130 zip codes where at least a quarter of all properties with a mortgage were seriously underwater. The largest number of those zip codes were in the Cleveland, OH; St. Louis, MO and Dayton, OH.
The top five zip codes with the highest share of seriously underwater properties were 47374 in Richmond, IN (76.3 percent seriously underwater); 95969 in Paradise, CA (69.6 percent); 08611 in Trenton, NJ (59.6 percent); 71446 in Leesville, LA (58 percent) and 53206 in Milwaukee, WI (58 percent).
Report methodology
The ATTOM Data Solutions U.S. Home Equity & Underwater report provides counts of properties based on several categories of equity — or loan to value (LTV) — at the state, metro, county and zip code level, along with the percentage of total properties with a mortgage that each equity category represents. The equity/LTV is calculated based on record-level loan model estimating position and amount of loans secured by a property and a record-level automated valuation model (AVM) derived from publicly recorded mortgage and deed of trust data collected and licensed by ATTOM Data Solutions nationwide for more than 155 million U.S. properties. The ATTOM Data Solutions Home Equity and Underwater report has been updated and modified to better reflect a housing market focused on the traditional home buying process. ATTOM Data Solutions found that markets where investors were more prominent, they would offset the loan to value ratio due to sales involving multiple properties with a single jumbo loan encompassing all of the properties. Therefore, going forward such activity is now excluded from the reports in order to provide traditional consumer home purchase and loan activity.
Definitions
Seriously underwater: Loan to value ratio of 125 percent or above, meaning the property owner owed at least 25 percent more than the estimated market value of the property.
Equity-rich: Loan to value ratio of 50 percent or lower, meaning the property owner had at least 50 percent equity.
About ATTOM Data Solutions
ATTOM Data Solutions provides premium property data to power products that improve transparency, innovation, efficiency and disruption in a data-driven economy. ATTOM multi-sources property tax, deed, mortgage, foreclosure, environmental risk, natural hazard, and neighborhood data for more than 155 million U.S. residential and commercial properties covering 99 percent of the nation’s population. A rigorous data management process involving more than 20 steps validates, standardizes and enhances the data collected by ATTOM, assigning each property record with a persistent, unique ID — the ATTOM ID. The 9TB ATTOM Data Warehouse fuels innovation in many industries including mortgage, real estate, insurance, marketing, government and more through flexible data delivery solutions that include bulk file licenses, property data APIs, real estate market trends, marketing lists, match & append and introducing the first property data delivery solution, a cloud-based data platform that streamlines data management – Data-as-a-Service (DaaS).
Media Contact:
Christine Stricker
949.748.8428
christine.stricker@attomdata.com
Data and Report Licensing:
949.502.8313
datareports@attomdata.com
SOURCE ATTOM Data Solutions
Realtor.com® Weekly Recovery Report: Peak Home Buying Season Shifts from May to August This Year
Santa Clara, CA – Aug. 6, 2020 (PRNewswire) Home buying season’s usual May peak has shifted to August as buyers and sellers rebound from spring’s COVID disruption, according to realtor.com®‘s Weekly Recovery Report. This week’s data shows growth in pace of sales, demand and prices have surpassed last year levels, while inventory continues to lag seasonal normals.
The realtor.com Housing Market Recovery Index reached 103.8 nationwide for the week ending Aug. 1, posting a 0.1 point increase over last week and bringing the index 3.8 points above the pre-COVID baseline.
“Real estate activity in the U.S. has regained its strength and continues on an upward trajectory as we enter the middle of the summer,” said Javier Vivas, director of economic research for realtor.com®. “However, a sustained seller comeback still hinges on back-to-school plans and extended lockdowns. The housing market will need to remain above pre-COVID levels for at least another 10 weeks to make up for the lost activity in the second quarter of the year. As we head into fall, an anticipated resurgence in COVID cases and economic aftershocks are likely to create an uphill battle for home buyers and sellers.”
Key Findings:
- Time on market is now 4 days faster than last year. As a result of still too few homes for sale and mortgage rates at or near-record lows, homes are selling even faster than a year ago nationwide and in many metros, a plus for sellers looking to move quickly.
- Median listing prices grew at 9.4 percent over last year, continuing to pick up speed. The strength of prices against an uncertain economic landscape that includes a double-digit unemployment rate is perhaps the most surprising aspect of how the housing market has fared — a dramatic departure from the last time unemployment was in double-digit territory. However, looking at the sheer number of buyers, low mortgage rates, and limited sellers, the strength of home prices — which are now growing at the highest pace since January 2018 — makes sense.
- New listings were down 11 percent. The gradual improvement in the trend of new sellers listing homes took a pause this week despite continued price gains. Selling a home now may involve some extra precautions, but it is very possible. Continued recovery in new listings is needed before we can see sales fully recover.
- Total inventory was down 35 percent. With buyer interest high and the number of new sellers still lagging, the total number of homes for sale continues to dwindle. These conditions set the stage for further price gains ahead, a trend which could eventually cause buyer demand to cool.
- Local Recovery: Regionally, the West (110.5) continues to lead the pack in the recovery, with the overall index now visibly above the pre-COVID benchmark. The Northeast (108.2) remains above recovery pace and continues to improve, while the South (99.5) and Midwest (98.8) continue to lag. Locally, a total of 29 markets have crossed the recovery benchmark, with the overall recovery index showing greatest recovery in New York, Las Vegas, Seattle, Boston and Philadelphia.
| Listings Data Summary | ||||
| Week ending Aug 1 | Week ending July 25 | Week ending July 18 | First Two Weeks March | |
| Total Listings | -35% YOY | -34% YOY | -33% YOY | -16% YOY |
| Time on Market | 4 days faster YOY | 4 days faster YOY | 1 day faster YOY | 4 days faster YOY |
| Median Listing Prices | +9.4% YOY | +9.1% YOY | +9.1% YOY | +4.5% YOY |
| New Listings | -11% YOY | -11% YOY | -15% YOY | +5% YOY |
| Top 50 Metros Recovery Index | |||
| Rank | Metro | Recovery Index(Week Ending 7/25) | Recovery Index (Weekly Change) |
| 1 | New York-Newark-Jersey City, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. | 129.6 | 9.6 |
| 2 | Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nev. | 117.1 | 1.3 |
| 3 | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash. | 115.5 | -1.3 |
| 4 | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H. | 115.2 | -4.2 |
| 5 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. | 115.2 | 0.6 |
| 6 | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo. | 115.0 | 0.6 |
| 7 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Calif. | 114.1 | 0.5 |
| 8 | San Diego-Carlsbad, Calif. | 111.9 | 2.8 |
| 9 | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. | 110.6 | -0.2 |
| 10 | San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif. | 110.1 | -3.3 |
| 11 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-Va.-Md.-W. Va. | 109.0 | 0.6 |
| 12 | Austin-Round Rock, Texas | 108.5 | -0.8 |
| 13 | Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. | 108.3 | -1.2 |
| 14 | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash. | 107.3 | 0.7 |
| 15 | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Md. | 107.0 | 2.9 |
| 16 | Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Va.-N.C. | 106.6 | 2.0 |
| 17 | Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. | 106.1 | 0.8 |
| 18 | Pittsburgh, Pa. | 105.6 | 1.9 |
| 19 | Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind. | 105.2 | 4.8 |
| 20 | Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn. | 104.1 | -0.8 |
| 21 | Providence-Warwick, R.I.-Mass. | 103.3 | -0.6 |
| 22 | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Fla. | 102.5 | 1.2 |
| 23 | Rochester, N.Y. | 102.4 | -2.8 |
| 24 | Raleigh, N.C. | 102.3 | 3.4 |
| 25 | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla. | 102.2 | 0.4 |
| 26 | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C. | 101.4 | 0.0 |
| 27 | Kansas City, Mo.-Kan. | 101.0 | -0.5 |
| 28 | San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas | 100.9 | 0.5 |
| 29 | Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas | 100.2 | 0.2 |
| 30 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. | 99.7 | -1.7 |
| 31 | Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif. | 99.6 | 0.2 |
| 32 | Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, Tenn. | 99.6 | 0.7 |
| 33 | St. Louis, Mo.-Ill. | 99.5 | 1.3 |
| 34 | Jacksonville, Fla. | 99.3 | 3.4 |
| 35 | Memphis, Tenn.-Miss.-Ark. | 99.2 | 0.6 |
| 36 | Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio | 99.1 | -3.9 |
| 37 | Louisville/Jefferson County, Ky.-Ind. | 99.0 | -0.1 |
| 38 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Ga. | 98.8 | 1.0 |
| 39 | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas | 98.3 | -1.4 |
| 40 | Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich | 97.9 | 2.0 |
| 41 | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Fla. | 96.8 | 0.2 |
| 42 | Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, N.Y. | 96.4 | -1.7 |
| 43 | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. | 95.4 | -1.9 |
| 44 | New Orleans-Metairie, La. | 94.4 | -3.1 |
| 45 | Birmingham-Hoover, Ala. | 94.3 | -0.4 |
| 46 | Columbus, Ohio | 92.8 | -1.2 |
| 47 | Richmond, Va. | 92.2 | -2.5 |
| 48 | Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, Ind. | 92.0 | 0.5 |
| 49 | Oklahoma City, Okla. | 91.4 | -3.3 |
| 50 | Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wis. | 89.2 | -1.5 |
Link to Weekly Stats Blog Post:
Link to Index Commentary Blog Post: https://www.realtor.com/research/housing-market-recovery-index-trends-august-1-data/
Methodology: The Weekly Housing Index leverages a weighted average of realtor.com® search traffic, median list prices, new listings, and median time on market and compares it to the January 2020 market trend, as a baseline for pre-COVID market growth. The overall index is set to 100 in this baseline period. The higher a market’s index value, the higher its recovery and vice versa.
| cbsa_title | hh_rank | median_listing _price_yy | active_listing_ count_yy | median_days_on_ market_by_day _yy | median_days_on_ market_yy | new_listing _count_yy | new_listing _share_yy | price_reduced_ count_yy | price_reduced_ share_yy |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. | 1 | 7.70% | -13.00% | -16 | -23.20% | 56.30% | 4.50% | -33.30% | -1.50% |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Calif. | 2 | 23.80% | -24.60% | 5 | 10.40% | -6.70% | 2.10% | -46.00% | -2.00% |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. | 3 | 5.50% | -34.10% | -3 | -6.50% | -13.20% | 2.80% | -42.90% | -1.40% |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas | 4 | 2.80% | -39.40% | -3 | -6.00% | -18.30% | 2.90% | -49.80% | -2.20% |
| Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas | 5 | 4.60% | -29.40% | -4 | -7.10% | -12.30% | 1.80% | -41.60% | -1.70% |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. | 6 | 18.70% | -44.80% | -14 | -23.30% | -3.40% | 5.30% | -48.50% | -0.90% |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-Va.-Md.-W. Va. | 7 | 12.00% | -43.40% | -13 | -28.90% | -4.60% | 6.40% | -52.00% | -1.60% |
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Fla. | 8 | -0.90% | -13.10% | 11 | 11.20% | -8.30% | 0.30% | -30.00% | -0.90% |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Ga. | 9 | 7.50% | -40.00% | -2 | -3.90% | -16.00% | 3.20% | -47.90% | -1.30% |
| Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H. | 10 | 13.70% | -33.10% | -13 | -25.00% | -4.60% | 4.00% | -47.80% | -1.90% |
| San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif. | 11 | 15.70% | -14.50% | -1 | -2.80% | 0.20% | 2.10% | -20.90% | -0.60% |
| Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich | 12 | 8.70% | -40.40% | 2 | 5.40% | -21.40% | 3.10% | -49.20% | -1.60% |
| Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. | 13 | 2.70% | -44.10% | -10 | -18.20% | -3.80% | 6.20% | -58.70% | -3.50% |
| Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash. | 14 | 5.00% | -29.80% | -9 | -22.00% | -8.50% | 3.40% | -64.50% | -4.70% |
| Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. | 15 | 3.30% | -28.50% | -1 | -2.40% | -5.00% | 3.30% | -47.20% | -2.10% |
| Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. | 16 | 7.70% | -55.40% | -3 | -5.50% | -21.30% | 6.00% | -71.00% | -2.90% |
| Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla. | 17 | 7.10% | -40.00% | -4 | -6.70% | -16.80% | 2.90% | -46.40% | -1.20% |
| San Diego-Carlsbad, Calif. | 18 | 9.10% | -44.40% | -4 | -9.50% | -6.60% | 6.70% | -55.00% | -2.10% |
| St. Louis, Mo.-Ill. | 19 | 9.00% | -36.50% | 0 | 0.00% | -10.30% | 3.30% | -46.60% | -1.50% |
| Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo. | 20 | 8.00% | -35.50% | -5 | -11.90% | -10.30% | 4.00% | -44.10% | -2.10% |
| Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Md. | 21 | 4.70% | -50.50% | -13 | -23.20% | -12.90% | 5.60% | -56.70% | -1.50% |
| Pittsburgh, Pa. | 22 | 25.00% | -34.20% | -6 | -10.00% | -9.30% | 2.80% | -39.50% | -0.90% |
| Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash. | 23 | 5.40% | -42.60% | 1 | 2.30% | -10.30% | 5.00% | -25.70% | 2.20% |
| Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C. | 24 | 5.90% | -46.90% | -7 | -13.50% | -22.40% | 3.90% | -60.10% | -2.80% |
| Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Fla. | 25 | 0.40% | -18.20% | 0 | 0.00% | 0.30% | 1.70% | -28.90% | -1.20% |
| Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio | 26 | 15.20% | -49.50% | -3 | -5.60% | -28.40% | 3.50% | -57.30% | -1.60% |
| San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas | 27 | 5.30% | -35.80% | 0 | 0.00% | -9.90% | 2.90% | -48.90% | -2.20% |
| Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind. | 28 | 21.70% | -47.60% | -5 | -10.20% | -23.70% | 4.40% | -56.30% | -1.80% |
| Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif. | 29 | 5.30% | -48.40% | -1 | -2.30% | -10.70% | 6.80% | -62.10% | -3.20% |
| Kansas City, Mo.-Kan. | 30 | 13.40% | -47.20% | 1 | 2.00% | -30.40% | 2.90% | -59.70% | -2.20% |
| Columbus, Ohio | 31 | 8.10% | -46.30% | -4 | -9.50% | -29.50% | 3.50% | -58.60% | -3.20% |
| Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, Ind. | 32 | 6.20% | -49.80% | 0 | 0.00% | -33.00% | 3.00% | -53.70% | -1.10% |
| Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nev. | 33 | 5.30% | -15.10% | -3 | -6.30% | -2.60% | 1.20% | -49.40% | -4.40% |
| Austin-Round Rock, Texas | 34 | 8.60% | -38.00% | -7 | -14.00% | -1.50% | 4.60% | -60.90% | -4.40% |
| Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, Tenn. | 35 | 3.60% | -28.10% | -5 | -13.50% | -16.20% | 1.70% | -39.90% | -1.30% |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. | 36 | 9.40% | -29.20% | -7 | -16.70% | 9.20% | 5.30% | -38.30% | -1.70% |
| Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Va.-N.C. | 37 | 11.60% | -43.90% | -17 | -29.30% | -5.10% | 4.60% | -68.20% | -2.90% |
| Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wis. | 38 | 6.90% | -42.10% | 7 | 18.40% | -20.00% | 3.90% | -47.10% | -1.10% |
| Providence-Warwick, R.I.-Mass. | 39 | 11.70% | -48.50% | -7 | -12.50% | -5.70% | 6.60% | -67.00% | -2.50% |
| Jacksonville, Fla. | 40 | 1.90% | -34.40% | -7 | -9.90% | -17.20% | 1.90% | -45.70% | -1.60% |
| Oklahoma City, Okla. | 41 | 7.60% | -35.10% | 0 | 0.00% | -26.10% | 1.10% | -52.40% | -2.60% |
| Louisville/Jefferson County, Ky.-Ind. | 42 | 6.30% | -50.40% | -3 | -6.70% | -32.00% | 3.40% | -57.50% | -1.70% |
| Memphis, Tenn.-Miss.-Ark. | 43 | 11.10% | -47.70% | -5 | -9.30% | -26.90% | 3.40% | -46.60% | -0.10% |
| New Orleans-Metairie, La. | 44 | 10.00% | -33.10% | 2 | 2.90% | -28.60% | 0.50% | -37.80% | -0.50% |
| Richmond, Va. | 45 | 9.20% | -42.50% | 1 | 2.00% | -24.50% | 2.70% | -40.70% | 0.00% |
| Raleigh, N.C. | 46 | 3.20% | -36.60% | -15 | -25.90% | -6.20% | 3.90% | -55.10% | -3.10% |
| Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, N.Y. | 47 | 5.90% | -39.40% | 4 | 10.30% | -4.70% | 5.90% | -53.70% | -2.30% |
| Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn. | 48 | 6.90% | -30.80% | -15 | -25.40% | -3.20% | 2.30% | -62.90% | -3.00% |
| Birmingham-Hoover, Ala. | 49 | 6.10% | -35.90% | -3 | -5.20% | -9.80% | 2.90% | -32.30% | 0.20% |
| Rochester, N.Y. | 50 | 11.10% | -39.10% | -9 | -22.50% | -17.70% | 3.70% | -58.70% | -2.60% |
| Tucson, Ariz. | 51 | 12.20% | -43.20% | 0 | 0.00% | 2.20% | 6.30% | -53.60% | -1.80% |
| Salt Lake City, Utah | 52 | 13.10% | -52.00% | -2 | -5.30% | -11.00% | 7.80% | -59.90% | -2.30% |
| Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Mich | 53 | 5.60% | -39.20% | 4 | 9.80% | -28.00% | 2.00% | -60.40% | -3.30% |
| Tulsa, Okla. | 54 | 24.30% | -38.60% | -5 | -8.90% | -26.50% | 1.60% | -39.90% | -0.30% |
| Albany-Schenectady-Troy, N.Y. | 55 | 17.30% | -40.40% | 0 | 0.00% | -14.50% | 3.00% | -54.20% | -1.60% |
| Albuquerque, N.M. | 56 | 18.50% | -51.30% | -2 | -4.10% | -25.90% | 4.70% | -58.40% | -1.60% |
| Omaha-Council Bluffs, Neb.-Iowa | 57 | 4.40% | -35.60% | 11 | 31.40% | -26.20% | 1.60% | -58.50% | -2.90% |
| Worcester, Mass.-Conn. | 58 | 9.00% | -51.00% | -13 | -22.80% | -13.20% | 5.90% | -64.60% | -2.60% |
| Knoxville, Tenn. | 59 | 5.20% | -47.80% | -5 | -7.90% | -20.30% | 3.70% | -48.50% | -0.40% |
| Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Conn. | 60 | -2.40% | -21.50% | -34 | -40.50% | 47.40% | 3.40% | -36.50% | -1.10% |
| Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, S.C. | 61 | 3.10% | -33.90% | 2 | 3.50% | -23.00% | 1.20% | -30.20% | 0.30% |
| North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Fla. | 62 | 0.40% | -27.40% | -10 | -10.60% | 12.00% | 2.50% | -26.20% | -0.10% |
| New Haven-Milford, Conn. | 63 | 6.90% | -28.00% | -21 | -33.30% | 7.10% | 2.60% | -61.80% | -2.80% |
| Dayton, Ohio | 64 | 14.70% | -47.50% | -6 | -13.60% | -25.70% | 4.10% | -44.30% | 0.10% |
| Urban Honolulu, Hawaii | 65 | -11.00% | 30.10% | 13 | 22.00% | -11.60% | -2.40% | -51.40% | -3.20% |
| Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Pa.-N.J. | 66 | 24.40% | -59.50% | -30 | -46.20% | -22.20% | 6.40% | -64.50% | -1.20% |
| Columbia, S.C. | 67 | 7.20% | -47.40% | -10 | -19.20% | -28.60% | 2.70% | -55.00% | -1.40% |
| Baton Rouge, La. | 68 | 8.70% | -27.40% | 0 | 0.00% | -43.90% | -1.40% | -48.40% | -2.10% |
| Greensboro-High Point, N.C. | 69 | 11.90% | -42.80% | -5 | -8.50% | -10.70% | 4.20% | -36.90% | 0.30% |
| Fresno, Calif. | 70 | 6.40% | -60.50% | -4 | -8.70% | -16.10% | 9.50% | -64.60% | -1.40% |
| Charleston-North Charleston, S.C. | 71 | 8.60% | -35.40% | -9 | -11.70% | -12.30% | 2.10% | -57.50% | -3.70% |
| Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, Ark. | 72 | 19.60% | -46.50% | -11 | -18.30% | -23.30% | 3.10% | -47.60% | -0.30% |
| Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla. | 73 | 11.50% | -29.50% | -16 | -16.00% | -1.80% | 1.80% | -38.90% | -0.80% |
| Akron, Ohio | 74 | 9.20% | -48.30% | -1 | -2.00% | -27.50% | 3.60% | -42.70% | 0.50% |
| El Paso, Texas | 75 | 13.20% | -46.40% | 3 | 5.00% | -28.10% | 2.20% | -65.50% | -1.50% |
| Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif. | 76 | 12.60% | -44.30% | -2 | -4.20% | -16.30% | 4.40% | -61.80% | -3.10% |
| Colorado Springs, Colo. | 77 | 10.50% | -40.10% | 1 | 2.80% | -20.60% | 3.60% | -46.20% | -1.40% |
| Madison, Wis. | 78 | 4.40% | -37.00% | 1 | 2.00% | -2.70% | 4.60% | -36.70% | -0.40% |
| Bakersfield, Calif. | 79 | 11.60% | -51.40% | -11 | -23.90% | -21.40% | 5.30% | -59.80% | -1.50% |
| Winston-Salem, N.C. | 80 | 12.80% | -45.10% | -6 | -9.10% | -27.40% | 2.40% | -42.70% | 0.10% |
| Syracuse, N.Y. | 81 | 4.90% | -44.30% | 9 | 16.10% | -28.10% | 2.40% | -50.70% | -1.10% |
| Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, Fla. | 82 | 1.90% | -36.40% | -4 | -5.30% | -24.10% | 1.20% | -46.20% | -1.10% |
| Boise City, Idaho | 83 | 7.80% | -52.70% | -1 | -2.40% | -13.80% | 7.80% | -70.70% | -5.00% |
| Wichita, Kan. | 84 | 22.60% | -45.50% | -1 | -2.00% | -29.30% | 2.70% | -50.90% | -1.00% |
| Toledo, Ohio | 85 | 12.70% | -37.40% | -6 | -11.80% | -11.90% | 3.70% | 19.80% | 6.30% |
| Des Moines-West Des Moines, Iowa | 86 | -1.40% | -30.70% | -4 | -6.40% | -5.50% | 2.70% | -23.80% | 0.80% |
| Springfield, Mass. | 87 | 21.30% | -47.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -17.70% | 4.60% | -54.50% | -1.40% |
| Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla. | 88 | 6.50% | -21.90% | -2 | -3.00% | -7.40% | 1.40% | -35.70% | -1.10% |
| Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, Fla. | 89 | 1.50% | -31.00% | 1 | 1.70% | 3.60% | 3.60% | -49.70% | -2.60% |
| McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas | 90 | 7.30% | -42.30% | 2 | 2.20% | -41.60% | 0.10% | -52.50% | -0.70% |
| Harrisburg-Carlisle, Pa. | 91 | 13.00% | -50.30% | -24 | -40.00% | -4.00% | 6.90% | -62.60% | -2.30% |
| Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, Pa. | 92 | 9.50% | -49.80% | -18 | -23.70% | -18.90% | 3.50% | -56.30% | -1.00% |
| Augusta-Richmond County, Ga.-S.C. | 93 | 3.30% | -43.20% | -5 | -7.90% | -22.80% | 2.60% | -36.80% | 0.40% |
| Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Ohio-Pa. | 94 | 0.30% | -50.70% | -6 | -9.50% | -25.80% | 3.60% | -52.70% | -0.60% |
| Stockton-Lodi, Calif. | 95 | 3.80% | -58.00% | -1 | -2.30% | -15.70% | 8.80% | -74.30% | -3.70% |
| Durham-Chapel Hill, N.C. | 96 | 10.70% | -36.80% | -9 | -14.80% | -7.20% | 3.40% | -46.20% | -1.50% |
| Portland-South Portland, Maine | 97 | 10.70% | -44.90% | -3 | -5.70% | -22.10% | 3.30% | -65.80% | -2.50% |
| Spokane-Spokane Valley, Wash. | 98 | 12.20% | -46.50% | 2 | 4.90% | -21.30% | 5.00% | -53.10% | -1.40% |
| Chattanooga, Tenn.-Ga. | 99 | 17.30% | -48.50% | 3 | 5.00% | -39.40% | 1.40% | -60.20% | -1.70% |
| Jackson, Miss. | 100 | 20.00% | -38.60% | -9 | -10.30% | -24.30% | 1.40% | -38.50% | -0.10% |
About realtor.com®
Realtor.com® makes buying, selling and living in homes easier and more rewarding for everyone. Realtor.com® pioneered the world of digital real estate 20 years ago, and today through its website and mobile apps is a trusted source for the information, tools and professional expertise that help people move confidently through every step of their home journey. Using proprietary data science and machine learning technology,realtor.com® pairs buyers and sellers with local agents in their market, helping take the guesswork out of buying and selling a home. For professionals,realtor.com® is a trusted provider of consumer connections and branding solutions that help them succeed in today’s on-demand world. Realtor.com® is operated by News Corp [Nasdaq: NWS, NWSA] [ASX: NWS, NWSLV] subsidiary Move, Inc. under a perpetual license from the National Association of REALTORS®. For more information, visitrealtor.com®.
Media Contact:
Cody.Horvat@move.com
SOURCE realtor.com
